Victims of the barbaric “zero tolerance” coverage have filed claims towards the Trump administration, demanding tens of millions of dollars in damages for “inexplicable cruelty,” The Guardian experiences. “The federal government was harming youngsters deliberately to attempt to advance what it seen as a coverage goal,” lawyer Stanton Jones mentioned. “It is heinous and immoral, nevertheless it’s additionally a civil improper for which the legislation supplies a declare for aid.”
One claimant among the many six households within the authorized motion alleged that she was taunted with “Blissful Mom’s Day” as her 5-year-old was ripped out of her arms. Different claimants say that whereas their youngsters have been returned to them, they’re horrifically traumatized. “My daughter shouldn’t be the identical,” mentioned Leticia. “To this present day, if she drops one thing at house, she cries and begs me to not get mad at her or hit her.”
One other group of moms had beforehand sued the administration for the prices of psychological well being counseling. The federal government’s response was to ask the courts to toss the lawsuit. “The Authorities doesn’t owe a free-standing obligation to offer medical care to former detainees,” mentioned DOJ lawyer Michael Heyse. In a very simply world, not solely would these households have all of the assets they should heal, however they’d additionally see the perpetrators locked up.
We should additionally keep in mind that household separation imposes additional violence on asylum seekers who have been already coping with traumatic experiences. Claimants have skilled “signs according to Publish-Traumatic Stress Dysfunction (PTSD), in response to consultants who examined them. Many proceed to expertise extreme anxiousness and different dangerous results,” attorneys say. “It was the worst second of my life,” Leticia continued, “when officers tore my crying daughter from my arms.”